I love Star Wars. It's my favorite film series of all time. I even like the prequels... Oh that's right, I said it. Even the prequels. I'm such a Star Wars nerd that I know how many main engines are on a Star Destroyer (it's 3) and I even know what planet Han Solo is from (its Corellia). So as you can imagine when I heard that there was going to be not only a Star Wars VII but stand alone movies about Han, Yoda, and Boba Fett, let's just say I got excited. REALLY EXCITED. Now that's not to say I didn't have reservations about it as well. I knew just how bad these movies could end up being cause we already have had bad Star Wars movies (I know I said I like the prequels but I do realize they suck. They're really guilty pleasures.). There are certain key elements that Disney must include in order to make Star Wars movies that can bring the magic that the originals brought to the big screen. And I'm going to tell you what those elements are. Here are the top 5 things Disney has to do to make a good Star Wars movie, by yours truly.
5. Include characters from the original trilogy: This has kind of been confirmed with the news that Harrison Ford is in talks to come back as Han. All we would need than, obviously, would be Fisher, Hamill, Dee- Williams, and Mayhew. I wouldn't mind seeing Daniels as C3PO and Baker as R2D2 again but in all honesty they don't NEED to be in it. If all these characters come back though, they shouldn't be the focus of the story. They should just be side characters sort of like mentors maybe to the other characters. Now obviously if they decide to put the sons and daughters of these characters in the movies than they would fit into the mentor roles seamlessly, but if the main characters end up being maybe Jedi than Luke would fit nicely into a Yoda- like role with Han and Leia just being allies (I kind of like this angle).
4. Make a movie for both parents and children: The original Star Wars came out almost forty years ago. Most fans of the series are parents by now with kids of their own who probably like the prequels while the parents stand by the originals. Probably the hardest thing this movie has to accomplish is to make a Star Wars that both generations of fans will love. One way of doing this would be to have the story have something to do with the new Jedi order that Luke forms. It would have the best things from both trilogies, good story and plot from the originals and the cool Jedi from the prequels, cause let's face it, that's really all the prequels had going for them.
3.Have ONE main villain for the whole trilogy: A big problem that the prequels have is that they have just too many villains. Yeah their all interesting and cool but it really bogs down the series when you have to introduce a new villain in each movie. It also really lessens the affect of the villain. For example, Count Dooku has a very interesting back story but it's only known to the viewer through dialogue. If Lucas were smarter, Dooku would have been a character in The Phantom Menace so that it could have been a surprise when he went to the dark side. He also would have been a much better and more fleshed out character and foreshadow to Anakin.
2. No Jar Jar: ...Self explanatory.
1. There has to be an actual war happening: It doesn't seem like it should be that big of a thing to bring up but this is one of the big reasons the prequels suck. I mean there isn't a war going on in episodes 1 and 2. No war. In a Star WARS movie. It's right in the fucking title for God's sake and yet Lucas thought it would be best to not have an actual war go on in the first two prequels and instead show a little whinny bitch cry about his bad dreams. Revenge of the Sith got better cause after two whole movies they finally got to the goddamn Clone Wars. It's pretty amazing actually that this point even has to be brought up but there it is. If we had had episodes 1 and 2 actually be about The Clone Wars as a whole the prequels probably would have been a lot better than they were (I can dream).
Well that's my two cents on it. They have a really good team working on episode VII and the stand alone movies that are planned so I'm optimistic. J.J. is a great choice to direct and Michael Arndt has proven that he can write characters and stories very well, and really that's what Star Wars is about. 2015 is a ways off and while I don't exactly know where life might take me by than, I do know that at midnight on it's release date I'll be right in that audience wearing my TIE fighter shirt and waving a lightsaber, ready to once again be taken to a galaxy far far away.
Reviews of movies and television new and old. This is strictly opinion so don't be offended if you disagree, even though I'm right. Segments include Netflix Reviews (movies I get in the mail from Netflix), Top 10 Lists, Reruns, (reviews of certain series's in full and certain episodes), and The Cinema Lounge (reviews of new films in theaters). There will also be a few specials every now and than.
Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Monday, February 11, 2013
Netflix Reviews: Road To Perdition
While browsing through Netflix I came across the Sam Mendes page and noticed that he made some films that I hadn't realized he made. Among them were Jarhead, Revolutionary Road, Away We Go, and Road To Perdition. The only things I heard about Road To Perdition before watching it were that it starred Tom Hanks, was based on a graphic novel, and that it was very underrated. I wasn't even aware that Mendes directed it. So I thought what the hell and put it on my queue. Now that I've finally watched it, I can honestly say that it has become one of my favorite movies of all time.
Road To Perdition stars Tom Hanks, Paul Newman, Daniel Craig, Jude Law, and Stanley Tucci. Hanks plays a hitman for the mob in the 1930s. His boss, played by Paul Newman, thinks of Hanks like a son, even though he already has a son whose played by Daniel Craig. Hanks' character, Michael, is also married and has two sons. When his oldest son discovers that his dad kills for the mob, Craig's character, Connor, decides that he may tell people about what he saw and goes after Michael's wife and younger son. With the mob on his tail including an assassin, played by Jude Law, Michael tries to stay alive, and will do anything to make sure no harm comes to his son.
Let me start off by saying that film looks absolutely beautiful. This was famed cinematographer Conrad L. Hall's final film before his death in 2003 and it just may be his best work. He also worked on Cool Hand Luke, Butch Cassidy and The Sundance Kid, and American Beauty, among other films. One scene in particular is that of one of the final ones in the film with Hanks and Newman in the rain. It's gorgeous and executed brilliantly.
Now I must admit I've only seen one film of Sam Mendes' and that's Skyfall but after watching that it immediately made me a fan of his and this film launched him into my favorites. He does a fantastic job hear, every shot is beautiful and every interaction is gripping. He totally gets the heart of the story and brings it out front and center, the relationships between fathers and sons. And not just between Hanks and his son but also Paul Newman and Daniel Craig. Both pairs start out about the same at the beginning but as the film goes on they become complete foils of each other, mainly Hanks' son and Craig.
Craig is basically what Hanks' son could be depending on what path he chooses to take with his life. Follow in his father's footsteps, or lead a good life away from crime and murder. This is an important point to the film and stays with it throughout all the way up to an ending that could have been ruined easily if Mendes were to let the son do something instead of Hanks. (Trying to keep it as spoiler free as I can.)
The cast is simply spectacular. I love seeing Tom Hanks in more gritty kinds of roles like this and he shines as the lead. Paul Newman is of course brilliant and does a great job as the mob boss. Jude Law plays a different role than his usual mo here as well and he is creepy and intimidating, just as he should be. Daniel Craig plays the scolded son just trying to earn his father's approval very well and shows that even back in 2002 he had amazing acting chops. Tyler Hoechin plays Hanks' son, Michael Jr, and even he does very well here too. The cast as a whole gives an amazing performance.
I'm kind of a sucker for father son stories that include both a literal journey and metaphorical journey i.e. The Road, and this one is also fully developed and realized. The relationship that evolves between the two is really very touching to watch. The film even manages to bring some humor into it as well when the relationship really starts to bud.
I mentioned this before but the film really reminds me of Shawshank Redemption. Not just in reputation, but in plot and tone. Hell even some shots were almost exact. There's a beach scene that resembles Shawshank in such a way that it made think I knew exactly what was going to happen and yet the film still surprised me.
Road To Perdition is just an amazing film. Everything about it is just damn near perfect. The look, the story, the acting, the themes, even the music all of it just works and fits together so well that it makes a very brilliant and a very different kind of gangster movie. It was totally underrated in it's time and deserved way more nominations, if not awards themselves, then it got. I'm just happy that I got to see it and that this beautiful gem didn't fly under my radar.
FINAL GRADE: A+
Road To Perdition stars Tom Hanks, Paul Newman, Daniel Craig, Jude Law, and Stanley Tucci. Hanks plays a hitman for the mob in the 1930s. His boss, played by Paul Newman, thinks of Hanks like a son, even though he already has a son whose played by Daniel Craig. Hanks' character, Michael, is also married and has two sons. When his oldest son discovers that his dad kills for the mob, Craig's character, Connor, decides that he may tell people about what he saw and goes after Michael's wife and younger son. With the mob on his tail including an assassin, played by Jude Law, Michael tries to stay alive, and will do anything to make sure no harm comes to his son.
Let me start off by saying that film looks absolutely beautiful. This was famed cinematographer Conrad L. Hall's final film before his death in 2003 and it just may be his best work. He also worked on Cool Hand Luke, Butch Cassidy and The Sundance Kid, and American Beauty, among other films. One scene in particular is that of one of the final ones in the film with Hanks and Newman in the rain. It's gorgeous and executed brilliantly.
Now I must admit I've only seen one film of Sam Mendes' and that's Skyfall but after watching that it immediately made me a fan of his and this film launched him into my favorites. He does a fantastic job hear, every shot is beautiful and every interaction is gripping. He totally gets the heart of the story and brings it out front and center, the relationships between fathers and sons. And not just between Hanks and his son but also Paul Newman and Daniel Craig. Both pairs start out about the same at the beginning but as the film goes on they become complete foils of each other, mainly Hanks' son and Craig.
Craig is basically what Hanks' son could be depending on what path he chooses to take with his life. Follow in his father's footsteps, or lead a good life away from crime and murder. This is an important point to the film and stays with it throughout all the way up to an ending that could have been ruined easily if Mendes were to let the son do something instead of Hanks. (Trying to keep it as spoiler free as I can.)
The cast is simply spectacular. I love seeing Tom Hanks in more gritty kinds of roles like this and he shines as the lead. Paul Newman is of course brilliant and does a great job as the mob boss. Jude Law plays a different role than his usual mo here as well and he is creepy and intimidating, just as he should be. Daniel Craig plays the scolded son just trying to earn his father's approval very well and shows that even back in 2002 he had amazing acting chops. Tyler Hoechin plays Hanks' son, Michael Jr, and even he does very well here too. The cast as a whole gives an amazing performance.
I'm kind of a sucker for father son stories that include both a literal journey and metaphorical journey i.e. The Road, and this one is also fully developed and realized. The relationship that evolves between the two is really very touching to watch. The film even manages to bring some humor into it as well when the relationship really starts to bud.
I mentioned this before but the film really reminds me of Shawshank Redemption. Not just in reputation, but in plot and tone. Hell even some shots were almost exact. There's a beach scene that resembles Shawshank in such a way that it made think I knew exactly what was going to happen and yet the film still surprised me.
Road To Perdition is just an amazing film. Everything about it is just damn near perfect. The look, the story, the acting, the themes, even the music all of it just works and fits together so well that it makes a very brilliant and a very different kind of gangster movie. It was totally underrated in it's time and deserved way more nominations, if not awards themselves, then it got. I'm just happy that I got to see it and that this beautiful gem didn't fly under my radar.
FINAL GRADE: A+
Tuesday, February 5, 2013
The Cinema Lounge: Hitchcock
Good evening. Tonight we will be talking about Alfred Hitchcock, the legendary director known as the master of suspense. He's made such classics as Rear Window, Vertigo, North By Northwest, and Psycho. He is considered by many as one of the greatest directors of all time by many, including myself. The film Hitchcock follows the notorious director as he makes the film, he's probably most famous for, Psycho.
Hitchcock stars Anthony Hopkins as the man himself, Helen Mirren as his troubled but faithful wife, Scarlett Johanson as Janet Leigh, and Jessica Biel as Vera Miles. The film was directed by Sacha Gervasi. This is Gervasi's second film after the documentary Anvil: The Story of Anvil. He has however written a few films as well including the Steven Spielberg helmed film The Terminal.
As I mentioned, the film centers on Hitchcock's time while making Psycho. It also explores his relationship with his wife, Alma, which really is the main focus of film. This kind of caught everyone off guard I think cause the trailers pointed tot the real focus of the film being completely about the making of Psycho. Now technically it could be argued that this is the main focus but the heart of the movie lies with the relationship between Hitchcock and Alma.
I really enjoyed this film and I feel it's very underrated. For his first film Gervasi does a very good job at making it seem as though Hitchcock himself had a hand in making this. The performances by everyone is stellar. Anthony Hopkins does a fine job at playing the film legend. He captures the essence of the man while being able to make it a character of his own. The lovely Scarlett Johanson plays off Hopkins well and their relationship touches on one of the many obsessive tendencies that Hitchcock had. The true stand out of the film is Helen Mirren who does an exceptional job as Alma.
The biggest problem with the film is the writing. It is at times predictable and has some tired cliches throughout it. It also has problems with tone but I felt that it wasn't that much of a problem and if you like some more macabre humor, which you should if you're seeing a film about Alfred Hitchcock, than you shouldn't have that big of a problem with it.
This film explores something that I've always had a personal interest in: fame and the effects of it on the famous and their loved ones. Alfred Hitchcock is now considered one of the greatest directors of all time and yet this film shows that he never felt good enough. There's a line Hopkins has in it which states "I just want them to tell me I'm good enough". I think this is a fear that all people in the film industry have and this film is all about that. Not only being good enough in the eyes of your peers and the industry but also in the eyes of your loved ones, in his case Alma.
I wish this got more recognition because anyone who's a fan of Hitchcock would find this movie at the very least interesting. However with it's terrific performances by a great cast and it's top notch directing by a reletive new comer I feel it was not only interesting but also very entertaining. I leave you with the words of the great master himself and bid you all, good evening.
FINAL GRADE: A-
Hitchcock stars Anthony Hopkins as the man himself, Helen Mirren as his troubled but faithful wife, Scarlett Johanson as Janet Leigh, and Jessica Biel as Vera Miles. The film was directed by Sacha Gervasi. This is Gervasi's second film after the documentary Anvil: The Story of Anvil. He has however written a few films as well including the Steven Spielberg helmed film The Terminal.
As I mentioned, the film centers on Hitchcock's time while making Psycho. It also explores his relationship with his wife, Alma, which really is the main focus of film. This kind of caught everyone off guard I think cause the trailers pointed tot the real focus of the film being completely about the making of Psycho. Now technically it could be argued that this is the main focus but the heart of the movie lies with the relationship between Hitchcock and Alma.
I really enjoyed this film and I feel it's very underrated. For his first film Gervasi does a very good job at making it seem as though Hitchcock himself had a hand in making this. The performances by everyone is stellar. Anthony Hopkins does a fine job at playing the film legend. He captures the essence of the man while being able to make it a character of his own. The lovely Scarlett Johanson plays off Hopkins well and their relationship touches on one of the many obsessive tendencies that Hitchcock had. The true stand out of the film is Helen Mirren who does an exceptional job as Alma.
The biggest problem with the film is the writing. It is at times predictable and has some tired cliches throughout it. It also has problems with tone but I felt that it wasn't that much of a problem and if you like some more macabre humor, which you should if you're seeing a film about Alfred Hitchcock, than you shouldn't have that big of a problem with it.
This film explores something that I've always had a personal interest in: fame and the effects of it on the famous and their loved ones. Alfred Hitchcock is now considered one of the greatest directors of all time and yet this film shows that he never felt good enough. There's a line Hopkins has in it which states "I just want them to tell me I'm good enough". I think this is a fear that all people in the film industry have and this film is all about that. Not only being good enough in the eyes of your peers and the industry but also in the eyes of your loved ones, in his case Alma.
I wish this got more recognition because anyone who's a fan of Hitchcock would find this movie at the very least interesting. However with it's terrific performances by a great cast and it's top notch directing by a reletive new comer I feel it was not only interesting but also very entertaining. I leave you with the words of the great master himself and bid you all, good evening.
FINAL GRADE: A-
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)